I feel so bad for this lady! What ever happened to just blurring out the faces of people that wanted to remain anonymous?The live broadcast starts out like most, with the news reporter doing his thing and reporting the news. He talks about how burglars used a basketball to break a window to get into a house.

Then he turns the camera to interview the heroic neighbor who called the police.

Even though she saved the day, the woman clearly wanted to remain anonymous; but in an attempt to avoid showing her face in the frame, the videographer focuses the camera straight down at her crotch—for at least 10 seconds or more—and all you see is this poor woman's GIANT camel toe!

To take up for the camera operator, it's not uncommon for a videographer to point the camera at the hands of the person who wishes to remain anonymous. In this case, there just happened to be something pretty embarrassing eating her pants right behind them, and there was no way to un-see it!

My question is, did the person who produced this package not know, or did they just not care? Couldn't they have used the surplus of neighborhood footage while her audio played in the background?

I mean, they may as well have just played this song underneath the entire package.

[YouTube]