<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>HOT 107.9 &#187; rating system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1079ishot.com/tags/rating-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1079ishot.com</link>
	<description>Acadiana&#039;s Hottest Music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Celebs Need Worry About New Photoshop Rating System</title>
		<link>http://1079ishot.com/celebs-ratings-system-photoshop/</link>
		<comments>http://1079ishot.com/celebs-ratings-system-photoshop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shauna Wright</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rating system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsminteractive.com/?p=62838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These days, it’s almost unheard of to see a celebrity photo that hasn’t been airbrushed or otherwise digitally manipulated to make the person in the picture look nearly flawless. While they may make pretty magazine covers, two researchers are proposing a ratings system to let people know exactly how much a photo has been manipulated. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, it’s almost unheard of to see a celebrity photo that hasn’t been airbrushed or otherwise digitally manipulated to make the person in the picture look nearly flawless. While they may make pretty magazine covers, two researchers are proposing a <a href="http://www.livescience.com/17206-digital-photos-celebrity-retouched.html">ratings system</a> to let people know exactly how much a photo has been manipulated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://1079ishot.com/celebs-ratings-system-photoshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/1079ishot.com/files/2011/11/photoshop-before-after.jpg" height="480" width="640" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">torimbc, Flickr</media:description>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 712/745 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/1079ishot.com

Served from: 1079ishot.com @ 2013-05-23 21:11:10 -->